Strom Law Blog


Life After Conviction: Living With a Criminal Record

June 26th, 2009 . by Pete Strom

If you do the crime, you do the time or so the saying goes. But when you walk out of the prison, what happens next? It’s relatively easy to agree that if you are charged and convicted for a serious crime such as kidnapping or manslaughter that you may continue to face a stigma after you serve your time, but what if it is your first and only offense for writing a bad check? Even worse, what happens if the offense was a single slip up as a teenager? The hard facts are that unless you qualify for an expungement or a pardon your criminal record may follow you around, and hold you back, for the rest of your life.

Lost opportunity

In the midst of continued job loss, with over six million jobs lost since December 2007, there is increased competition and employers are able to be picky about who they chose to fill any open positions. Every single job application that I have ever seen includes a provision that specifically asks you if you have ever been convicted of a crime. Many applications promise that a conviction may not be held against you and that every conviction will be reviewed based upon the individual circumstances, but is that really the case? With so many people competing for a single position, how can an employer overlook this when the next qualified candidate has an impeccable record?

With that being said, if you have been convicted are you tempted to plead ignorance and leave this section blank? These applications also say that if you are hired and anything in your employment application is found to be inaccurate, you will be terminated.

Governor Mark Sanford and the South Carolina legislature recently reexamined your entitlement to an expungment. Changes to the former act include:
• An increase in the amount an expungement will cost to $250.00.
• Under S.C. Code Ann 22-5-910, you may now seek an expungement for a first offense conviction provided it does not carry a penalty of not more than thirty (30) days imprisonment or a fine of Five Hundred ($500) Dollars or both, three years after the date of the conviction.
• If your case was dismissed in Summary Court by a Summary Court Judge after June 2, 2009, an order for expungement will automatically be prepared by that Judge at no cost to the Defendant.
• The cost of the expungement will be waived if you were a defendant in General Sessions court and your charges were dismissed, not prosecuted, or you were found not guilty. (This does not apply if your charge was dismissed as a result of a fee agreement).
• The waiting period to request an expungement for a youthful offender conviction is now 5 years as opposed to 15.

Back to our example. Under the current South Carolina law, if you are charged with writing a bad check, it is your first offense, and the amount is less than 1,000, you may apply for an expungement one year after your conviction provided that it is your first offense, you have never received an expungement before, and you have not been charged with any other crimes. Does the one year waiting period serve its purpose or keep you from getting a job, cause additional financial pressure and make it more likely for you to commit another crime?

So what do you think? Is this fair, or should we all be taking a closer look at the way a simple conviction can follow you for the rest of your life?

For more information regarding how to determine whether you are entitled to an expungement, please click here.


Cocaine Sentencing Change on the Horizon

June 26th, 2009 . by Pete Strom

Attorney General Eric Holder has joined supporters in erasing the disparity in sentences for crack cocaine and cocaine crimes. During a legal discussion sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus he said: “One thing is very clear: We must review our federal cocaine sentencing policy.”

On a more local note, on June 15, 2009, the Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, concluded that a 1-to-1 ratio between crack cocaine and cocaine was appropriate in sentencing a defendant represented by Strom Law Firm, LLC. She continued by saying that in crack cases the Court would consider whether an upward variance was appropriate for aggravating factors related to violent conduct.

Although the support for a change in sentencing continues to grow, many lawmakers are unsure just how to change these guidelines. The Obama administration is arguing for a strict 1-to-1 ratio in sentencing. However, there is a debate as to whether to close the gap by lowering the penalty for crack cocaine while increasing the penalty for powder cocaine.

Tough penalties for crack cocaine offenses are also affecting how juries rule during trials. According to Holder, juries have acquitted black defendants because they believed the sentences the suspects faced were unfairly long.

Virginia Democratic Representative Bobby Scott agrees the current 100-to-1 sentencing ratio is racial discrimination. He says, “there is a compete consensus that the present pattern for sentencing crack and powder is absurd; there is not a complete consensus about what to do about it.”


South Carolina Attorney General Insurance Fraud Division Crackdown

June 25th, 2009 . by Pete Strom

Did you have any idea that the average American household pays $1,030 per year in out-of-pocket costs as a result of insurance fraud? As reported by the S.C. Attorney General’s Insurance Fraud division, if insurance fraud were a business, it would be a Fortune 500 company!

A new report issued by the South Carolina Attorney General’s Insurance Fraud Division shows a whopping 44% increase in insurance fraud convictions in 2008, confirming 135 convictions for insurance fraud in 2008, a jump from 94 convictions in 2007. The number of complaints rose from 712 in 2007 to 815 complaints in 2008.

The breakdown of the claims filed in 2008 was:

Automobile claims 57%
Personal/Commercial Property 12%
Worker’s Compensation 11%
Health/Medical 11%
Disability 4%
Life Insurance 3%
Premiums 2%
Other 1%

Interested in what the Department is seeing?

Seven of the most common types of insurance fraud are:

• Underreporting the number of miles you drive on your auto policy.
• Failing to report an accurate medical history when applying for health insurance.
• Faking or exaggerating injuries to avoid work and draw workers’ compensation benefits.
• Falsifying or overstating an injury sustained in a car accident — or even faking the accident — to achieve a large settlement or award.
• Staging an automobile accident which results in an inflated injury claim.
• Drawing accident and health insurance benefits because of exaggerated or even fabricated injuries or illness.
• Exaggerating the amount and value of items stolen from a home or business.

In an attempt to cut down on fraud, South Carolina has a mandatory reporting act that states, “any person, insurer or authorized agency having reason to believe that another has made a false statement or misrepresentation or has knowledge of a suspected false statement or misrepresentation shall, for purpose of reporting and investigation, notify the Insurance Fraud Division of the Office of the Attorney General of the knowledge or belief and provide any additional information within his possession relative thereto”.

A hotline has been established to report allegations of fraud: 1-888-95-FRAUD


When Promised Debt Relief, Proceed with Caution

June 18th, 2009 . by Pete Strom

By some estimates, the average American household has over 8,000 in credit card debt. In the midst of a continued recession many of us are dealing with job loss, high monthly bills, and we are all looking for ways to make our money go farther.

In comes the wolf in sheep’s clothing, a debt settlement solution specialist. The advertisements claim they can provide you with financial freedom from your high interest credit card bills, help you get out of debt by striking a settlement with your creditors, and keep your phone from ringing day and night with calls from creditors.

While we wish for an easy and honest solution, there is no federal regulation of debt counseling services and many states do not have any specific regulations that govern debt counseling, creating a potential for hardworking people to lose their money to fees, yet never get out of debt. In fact, last month, the New York Attorney General accused Nationwide Asset Services and Credit Solutions of American of charging high fees, placing its clients further in debt, and failing to provide any debt relief as promised.

With offers to get you out of debt coming in everyday, who do you turn to when you need help?

Here are some suggestions:

• Be leery of any company who advertises on television or radio, calls you on the phone, or sends you spam emails asking for financial information.
• Look for an agency that is a member of the National Foundation of Credit Counseling (NFCC), a 50-year-old organization with strict accreditation guidelines.
• Don’t give your credit card or bank account number to any agency over the phone.
• Don’t believe anyone who says that they can wipe out your debt.
• Do not trust anyone who charges you high fees to help you get out of debt.
• Insist on getting all terms, conditions, and payments up front and in writing before agreeing to use a specific agency.
• Place your name on the do not call list to cut down on the number of solicitations that you receive over the phone.
• Check with your local better business bureau to see if any complaints have been made against the company offering assistance.
• If you have already been a victim, contact an attorney who can help you protect your rights.

Strom Law Firm is a personal injury and criminal defense law firm centrally located in Columbia, South Carolina. Our firm proudly handles personal injury, criminal defense, defective products, class actions, pharmaceutical liability, toxic torts, medical malpractice, nursing home neglect, workers compensation, social security, veteran’s benefits, qui tam, predatory lending, tax investigations, business litigation, and wills and estates. Our lawyers proudly edit the Columbia, South Carolina Injury Board as well as the Strom Law Blog as a pro bono effort to provide the public valuable information. Our lawyers are licensed in: South Carolina, New York, Georgia, Florida, and the District of Columbia.


Toxic Chinese Drywall tied to Homeowner complaints.

May 21st, 2009 . by Pete Strom

Image of Corrosion sustained from Defective Chinese Drywall

Corroded Air Conditioner Coils Damaged by Defective Chinese Drywall

Desperation due to a domestic shortage of drywall during the housing boom, combined with a cheap available alternative, led builders to import drywall from China between 2004 -2008.

Homeowners with Chinese manufactured drywall are now complaining of corrosion of copper and other metals, a noxious odor, and health problems.

The Florida Department of Health has launched a site dedicated to the Chinese drywall issue and released the following five signs that may indicate the presence of Chinese drywall in your home:

1. There is presence of sulfur-like or other unusual odors
2. Confirmed presence of Chinese manufactured drywall in the home
3. Observed copper corrosion, indicated by black, sooty coating of un-insulated copper pipe leading to the air handling unit present in the garage or mechanical closet of home
4. Documented failure of air conditioner evaporator coil (located inside the air handling unit)
5. Confirmation by an outside expert or professional for the presence of premature copper corrosion on un-insulated copper wires and/or air conditioner evaporator coils (inside the air handling unit).

In addition, exposure to Chinese Drywall has also been tied to health complaints including, but not limited to, breathing and sinus problems, chest pain, physical ailments and symptoms including coughing, irritated eyes, sneezing, sinus problems, sore throat, asthma, difficulty breathing, runny nose, bloody nose, fatigue, headaches, dizziness and nausea. To date there is not enough data to make a determination.

The first piece of federal legislation related to defective Chinese drywall has been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives. The Drywall Safety Act of 2009, introduced by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) in March, seeks a recall of Chinese drywall and to ban the import of such materials made in China.

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation’s Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Insurance has scheduled the hearing for 10:30 a.m. on May 21.

Hundreds of homeowners have already filed Chinese drywall lawsuits against the manufacturers, exporters, suppliers, retailers and builders associated with the defective wall board. The complaints seek compensation for problems caused by the drywall, including the cost of repairs, which may involve replacing every piece of drywall in their newly constructed homes.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is scheduled to hear arguments later this month about whether to consolidate all federal lawsuits over Chinese drywall that have been filed in various districts throughout several states before one judge for coordinated handling during pretrial litigation.


Obama Nominates Inez Tenenbaum for CPSC Chair

May 11th, 2009 . by Pete Strom

Last Tuesday the White House announced that President Obama will nominate long time South Carolina politician Inez Tenenbaum for Chair of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).

Tenenbaum is the former South Carolina schools superintendent, serving from 1998 to 2007. She ran for the US Senate in 2004. Tenenbaum has been an advocate for children and families throughout her career.

President Obama stated that a “top priority of [his] administration is to ensure that products the American people depend on are safe.” He is confident that under new leadership, the agency will “achieve high standards of product safety that the American people deserve.”

Obama will also revitalize the CPSC by increasing the budget to $107 million, a 71% increase from the 2007 fiscal year. He will increase the number of commissioners from three to five. The President also announced Tuesday his intent to nominate Robert Alder, a professor of Legal Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Kenan-Flager Business school whose research has focused on consumer protection and product liability, for Commissioner when the additional seats are added.

Current Chair of the CPSC, Nancy Nord, was appointed by former President Bush in 2005. Members of Congress and other political figures have asked President Obama to encourage Nord to resign from her position. During Nord’s term as Chair, there have been a record number of recalls after unsafe products were released into the marketplace. Some of these recalled products included toys and cribs that were dangerous to young children. Her current term is set to expire in October of 2012.


“Columbia has long suffered cr…

April 21st, 2009 . by Pete Strom

“Columbia has long suffered crime rates running 2 and 3 times the national average.” http://tinyurl.com/cez647


http://twitpic.com/1hwy4

February 14th, 2009 . by Pete Strom

http://twitpic.com/1hwy4


Federal Agents Nab 300 Alleged Illegal Workers at Greenville Plant

October 7th, 2008 . by Pete Strom
Employees at House of Raeford Farms. Photo by Charlotte Observer

Federal authorities have detained 300 alleged illegal immigrants after raiding the House of Raeford Farms’ Greenville, S.C. chicken processing plant. The bust took place during a 9 a.m. shift change Tuesday, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin McDonald.

Federal prosecutors and immigration agents have been investigating the plant’s hiring practices. McDonald says 12 people have been arrested in past months, and seven have pleaded guilty.

McDonald says a recent review of 825 workers’ immigration paperwork showed false information for more than 775.

Read the rest of this entry »


Levine Case heads to High Court, Could Have Significant Impact on Pre-emption Doctrine

September 25th, 2008 . by Pete Strom
Diana Levine, Photo by NY Times

Earlier this week, The New York Times prominently featured a front-page article on Diana Levine and her upcoming Supreme Court case surrounding the $6 million the pharmaceutical company Wyeth was ordered to pay her for failing to warn her adequately about the risks of one of its drugs. That award came from a Vermont jury after Levine lost much of her right arm.

In the spring of 2000, suffering from a migraine, Ms. Levine visited a clinic near here for a treatment she had received many times: Demerol for the pain and Wyeth’s drug Phenergan for nausea.

“Nothing wrong with either drug,” Ms. Levine said. “They’re both safe when given the right way.” Read the rest of this entry »